RURAL LABOUR ENQUIRY (61st Round of N.S.S.) 2004–05 REPORT ON EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT OF RURAL LABOUR HOUSEHOLDS ( MAIN REPORT)

CHAPTER IV

 

INCIDENCE OF UNEMPLOYMENT

INTRODUCTION

            Ever since the initiation of planning in India in 1950, the Government of India has laid stress on increasing employment and eventually eradicating unemployment from the country. Though there exists huge unemployment in India, both in urban and rural areas, yet the incidence of unemployment in rural areas deserves special attention as two-third of population still lives in rural areas. Further, as majority of population in rural areas still depends on agriculture and owing to seasonality in agriculture, there is peculiar and acute unemployment in rural India.  In the peak agricultural season, almost every person, who is in need of a job is able to get some work whereas in agricultural lean season, the majority of the workers, particularly those who depend upon wage-paid employment for earning their livelihood, remain either unemployed or have to compromise themselves with some petty jobs resulting in meagre earnings.  The job opportunities available outside agriculture within rural areas are inadequate to absorb the labour, rendered jobless during agricultural lean season.  The prevalence of disguised unemployment in agricultural sector further aggravates the problem of rural masses.  In this chapter, an attempt has been made to measure the extent of unemployment among men, women and child workers belonging to rural and agricultural labour households.  The term ‘unemployment’ connotes only those days on which the worker was available for work but there was no economic activity at all, due to non-availability of work.  Absence from work could be either due to non-availability of work or non-availability of persons for work for reasons such as sickness, bad weather, festivals, etc.  Though the estimates for both of these two categories have been presented separately, only the former has been taken as actual unemployment.

 

UNEMPLOYMENT OF USUALLY OCCUPIED PERSONS

a)  Rural Labour Households

(i)  All Classes

            State-wise data on duration of days not worked in respect of usually occupied men, women and children belonging to all the four groups of rural labour households are presented in Statements 4.1.1.1.1 to 4.1.1.1.3.  During 2004–05, taking all occupations together, the average annual number of days not worked by men workers belonging to all rural labour households at all-India level was 74 days. Out of these, 46 days were on account of non-availability of work and as such constituted the duration of actual unemployment.  The remaining 28 days were attributed to unemployment due to reasons such as sickness, bad weather, festivals, marriages, etc.  The corresponding figures of average annual number of days not worked by  women  workers were 115 days in 2004–05 as against 109 days in 1999 – 2000, which shows  an increasing trend in the number of days not worked.  It is observed that the actual days of unemployment i.e. due to non-availability of work had increased in 2004–05, both for men and women, as compared to 1999 – 2000.  An increasing trend was also observed in the unemployment duration, in respect of men and  women workers engaged in ‘agricultural labour’ and ‘non-agricultural labour’ occupations. The unemployment duration in ‘other occupations’, however, registered a marginal decline in the case of both men and women workers belonging to all rural labour households. 

 

 The summary figures on days not worked with break up ‘available for work’ and ‘not available for work’ are given in the following table 4.1(a).

 

 

 

Table 4.1 (a)

Average Annual Number of Days not Worked by Usually Occupied Persons belonging to Rural Labour Households

 

                                                                                                                                  (in number of days)

 

Agricultural Occupations

Non-Agricultural Occupations

Group of Households/

Available & seeking work

Not available for work

Available & seeking work

Not available for work

Sex

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

All Classes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

42

52

30

27

26

45

32

27

Women

33

49

81

75

17

28

58

51

Children

37

64

50

39

12

27

44

26

Scheduled Castes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

45

60

32

28

33

44

31

27

Women

38

56

87

75

17

25

59

43

Children

41

83

51

26

39

32

27

39

Scheduled Tribes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

28

38

34

30

17

22

25

29

Women

24

35

78

76

8

16

54

62

Children

15

58

53

60

-

30

108

30

Other Backward Classes

 

 

 

 

 

Men

38

52

29

26

24

52

35

28

Women

34

50

78

79

16

36

62

52

Children

41

56

53

39

3

27

36

20

 

Other Occupations

All  Occupations

Group of Households/

Available & seeking work

Not available for work

Available & seeking work

Not available for work

Sex

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

All Classes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

18

16

30

30

36

46

31

28

Women

33

8

68

81

32

40

77

75

Children

27

6

29

40

32

41

43

38

Scheduled Castes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

8

19

28

25

39

53

32

27

Women

2

13

64

78

33

48

83

72

Children

4

6

31

43

34

53

45

34


Table 4.1 (a)

1

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Scheduled Tribes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

12

12

32

45

25

32

32

31

Women

5

7

87

109

20

28

78

81

Children

7

1

23

50

11

34

44

53

Other Backward Classes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

17

18

34

30

32

48

31

27

Women

5

8

71

73

29

42

76

74

Children

1

-

39

26

27

38

47

34

               

State-wise analysis revealed that all major states except Gujarat, Haryana, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal experienced an increase in number of days not worked by men workers belonging to all rural labour households in 2004–05 as compared to 1999-2000.  The major states, which reported the duration of days not worked above the national average of 74 days, were Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal.  In case of women workers, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh reported the duration of days not worked higher than the national average of 115 days. 

 

(ii)  Scheduled Castes

            State-wise data on average duration of days not worked by usually occupied men, women and children belonging to scheduled castes rural labour households have been presented in Statements 4.1.1.2.1 to 4.1.1.2.3.  In respect of all occupations taken together, the duration of days not worked in 2004–05 for men and women belonging to scheduled caste households was reported at 80 and 120 days, respectively.  The corresponding figures for men and women workers in 1999-2000 were 71 and 116 days.   The actual days of unemployment for men and women workers also increased from 39 and 33 days in 1999-2000 to 53 and 48 days, respectively, in 2004 – 2005.  An overall increasing trend was also observed in the unemployment duration of workers engaged in ‘agricultural labour’ and ‘non-agricultural labour’ occupations. 

 

            Among major states, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal reported higher duration of days not worked than the national average of 80 days in respect of men workers belonging to scheduled castes rural labour households.  In the case of women workers, among major states, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh reported higher duration of days not worked than the national average of 120 days.

 

(iii)  Scheduled Tribes

            State-wise data on duration of days not worked by usually occupied men, women and child workers belonging to scheduled tribe rural labour households are presented in statements 4.1.1.3.1 to 4.1.1.3.3.  Taking all  occupations together, the duration of days not worked in respect of men and women workers belonging to scheduled tribes rural labour households were reported at 63 and 109 days in 2004–05  as against 57 and 98 days, respectively, in 1999-2000.   In case of actual days of unemployment also, an overall increasing trend was observed in all categories of workers.  An overall increasing trend was also observed in the duration of actual unemployment of men workers engaged in ‘agricultural labour’ and ‘non-agricultural labour’ occupations.  The figure for ‘other occupation’, however, remained at the previous level of 12 days.  In case of women workers also, unemployment due to non-availability of work increased in respect of workers engaged in ‘agricultural labour’, ‘non-agricultural labour’ and ‘other occupations’.  

Among major states, the duration of days not worked by men workers belonging to scheduled tribes rural labour households was higher than the all-India average of 63 days in Kerala, Maharashtra, Orissa, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal.  The maximum duration of days not worked among major states was observed in the state of Kerala (149 days) and the minimum in the state of Bihar (20 days).  In the case of women workers, the states of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Kerala, Maharashtra, Orissa, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal reported higher duration of days not worked than the national average of 109 days. The maximum duration of days not worked by women workers was reported in Kerala (201 days) and the minimum in Assam (39 days).

 

(iv )  Other Backward Classes

 

            State-wise data on duration of days not worked by usually occupied men, women and children belonging to other backward classes households have been presented in Statements 4.1.1.4.1 to 4.1.1.4.3.  It may be seen from the statements that the duration of unemployment has increased in 2004-05 over 1999-2000 in respect of all the three categories of workers.  

 

In case of male workers, the major states which reported higher duration of days not worked than the all India average of 75 days were Kerala, Maharashtra, Punjab and Tamil Nadu. In case of women workers, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh reported higher duration of days not worked than the all India average of 116 days.

 

b)  Agricultural Labour Households

            State-wise data on days not worked by usually occupied men, women and child workers belonging to agricultural labour households are presented in Statements 4.1.2.1.1 to 4.1.2.4.3.   The summary of data on average annual days not worked by usually occupied workers belonging to agricultural labour households  is given in table 4.2 (b) .

 

Table 4.2 (b)

Average Annual Number of Days not Worked by Usually Occupied Persons belonging to Agricultural Labour Households

 

                                                                                                                                           (in number of days)

 

Agricultural    Occupations

Non-agricultural     Occupations

Group of Households/

Available & seeking work

Not  available for work

Available & seeking work

Not  available for  work

Sex

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

All Classes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

42

46

31

42

26

45

35

27

Women

33

51

80

96

21

29

52

54

Children

37

70

49

40

8

19

24

33

Scheduled Castes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

45

54

32

53

32

43

33

27

Women

38

51

86

101

17

23

46

46

Children

41

67

50

-

24

13

7

67

Scheduled Tribes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

28

14

34

31

24

21

32

28

Women

24

37

78

91

17

14

36

65

Children

15

84

52

60

-

33

-

19

Other Backward Classes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

37

55

30

40

23

52

33

28

Women

34

54

77

98

14

39

63

57

Children

42

57

50

82

3

14

27

22

 

Table 4.2 (b)

 

 

Other Occupations

All Occupations

Group of Households/

Available & seeking work

Not available for work

Available & seeking work

Not available for work

Sex

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1999-2000

2004-05

1

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

All Classes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

19

15

28

29

39

41

30

28

Women

46

7

65

95

34

28

78

79

Children

37

1

36

57

36

18

44

44

Scheduled Castes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

9

13

25

23

41

40

31

28

Women

2

8

65

97

35

28

83

77

Children

4

8

39

60

34

22

46

51

Scheduled Tribes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

11

2

28

55

27

18

33

32

Women

5

2

91

130

22

14

79

96

Children

12

-

34

46

15

23

45

39

Other Backward Classes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

16

23

33

29

34

48

30

29

Women

5

9

72

79

30

34

77

76

Children

-

-

48

31

30

12

49

32

                 

 

Although majority of the rural labour households belonged to agricultural labour households, yet the pattern of unemployment among usually occupied persons belonging to agricultural labour households was quite different from the one observed in the case of rural labour households.  As compared to previous round survey, an overall declining trend in the duration of unemployment was observed in respect of all the categories of workers belonging to agricultural labour households barring men of all classes, women of other backward classes and children of scheduled tribes households where a marginal increase in the duration of unemployment was noticed.